In this blog, I make a case for what I think is the next step in the evolution of Agile project management. The focus of project management used to be based on managing Tasks that people perform to deliver a piece of software. Agile project management shifted focus to managing the delivery of Features. I believe that the time is ripe for the Agile community to take the next step: move towards Value driven project management.
Task driven Project Management
In waterfall projects, project management effort is geared towards delivering a predefined set of features within predefined time and budget constraints. During a project, project management effort is focused on managing the Tasks that are identified to deliver these features. It is hard to predict exactly which tasks are needed, how long they will take and how they depend on each other. The result is that projects are often delivered over time and over budget.
Feature driven Project Management
In Agile projects, project management effort is mostly focused on features. An Agile project may target a fixed release date and have a fixed budget, but the exact set of features that is delivered will be refined along the way. Managing the tasks to implement these features is left to the people that perform them. The effort of a Product Owner is focused on prioritizing and refining features that the Agile teams will work on.
This approach has proven to be much more effective in delivering software within time and budgetary constraints. However, the ultimate goal of software development should not be to deliver features within time and budget.
Value driven Project Management
Teams build features that add Value to the business. Examples of business objectives are “increase market share”, or “increase customer satisfaction”. Underlying such high level goals, there usually are lower level goals such as “increase the number of visitors to our website”, or “increase the percentage of visitors that buy a product”.
Currently, most people on Agile projects have a good understanding of the cost of features, but not of the Value that is delivered by these features. What do you think is more interesting to know about a software release:



- “A sum of 400 story points worth of features has been delivered”, or
- “The SEO optimization in the release resulted in a 30% increase in the number of visitors to our website, which resulted in an increase of market share by 5%”?

Written by
Marco Mulder
A
- Agent-Oriented Architecture
- Agentic AI Alignment
- Agentic AI for Customer Engagement
- Agentic AI for Decision Support
- Agentic AI for Knowledge Management
- Agentic AI for Predictive Operations
- Agentic AI for Process Optimization
- Agentic AI for Workflow Automation
- Agentic AI Safety
- Agentic AI Strategy
- Agile Development
- Agile Development Methodology
- AI Agents for IT Service Management
- AI for Compliance Monitoring
- AI for Customer Sentiment Analysis
- AI for Demand Forecasting
- AI for Edge Computing (Edge AI)
- AI for Energy Consumption Optimization
- AI for Predictive Analytics
- AI for Predictive Maintenance
- AI for Real Time Risk Monitoring
- AI for Telecom Network Optimization
- AI Governance Frameworks
- AI Implementation Approach
- AI Implementation Methodology
- AI in Cybersecurity
- AI Orchestration
- AI Performance Measurement (KPIs, ROI)
- AI Use-Case Discovery
- AI Use-Case Prioritization
- AI-Driven Business Transformation
- AI-Driven Cybersecurity Solutions
- Algorithm
- API Integration
- API Management
- Application Modernization
- Applied & GenAI
- Artificial Intelligence
- Artificial Neural Network
- Augmented Reality
- Autonomous AI Agents